Australia’s housing shortage is placing sustained pressure on the rental market, and the gap between housing demand and supply shows no sign of closing. For investors, this is more than a headline; it’s a structural shift reshaping how housing is built, funded and lived in.
Australia’s Growing Housing Shortage
The national housing supply gap continues to be a significant issue, as new housing supply is consistently outstripped by the demands of a growing population. In this evolving property climate, co-living investments are emerging as an increasingly popular choice for both new and established investors.
Is Co-Living Right for You?
We’ll walk you through our proven co-living investment model, answer your questions, and show you how to maximise rental returns.
What’s Driving the Housing Shortage and Housing Supply Gap in Australia?
The housing supply gap in Australia refers to the ongoing issue of supply failing to keep up with demand. This imbalance stems from a variety of factors, including changing lifestyle preferences and the increasing cost of materials.
Key Housing Shortage Pressures
- Population growth – Australia’s steady rise in population, driven by both natural increase and immigration, continues to outpace the number of new dwellings being built.
- Changing household types – More than 60% of Australian households are now made up of just one or two people. As a result, more homes are required to accommodate the same population than in previous decades.
- Urban preference – A growing desire to live in cities and regional centres with access to transport, jobs and amenities places more pressure on limited rental stock in these areas.
Major Supply-Side Challenges
- Lengthy planning and approval processes – Delays in local and state development approvals can hold up new rental housing for years.
- Skilled labour shortages – The construction industry continues to face shortages in qualified tradespeople, slowing down build times.
- Rising material costs – Inflation and supply chain issues have driven up the cost of building, affecting affordability for both developers and tenants.
- Limited land availability – In major metro areas, land suitable for development is scarce or highly contested.
- Community pushback – Local opposition to higher-density housing often results in fewer rental developments in key locations.
According to recent economic analysis from the Housing Industry Association, when housing supply fails to keep pace with the formation of new households, several outcomes can occur:
- Housing affordability deteriorates
- Rental vacancy rates fall
- Rents increase
- More people are forced to live in larger households than they would prefer
The HIA states that these are precisely the conditions currently being observed across Australia’s housing market.
Vacancy Rates and the Changing Rental Landscape
Vacancy rates across the country remain consistently low, with Cotality Australia’s Q1 report for 2026 showing a national vacancy rate of just 1.6%. That’s less than half the 3.2% average for the five years leading up to 2021.
The natural flow-on effect from low vacancy rates is increased rental competition and rising rental costs. It’s similar to what happens in popular tourist destinations during peak season – demand for accommodation will consistently outstrip availability, and prices will rise as a result.
The Affordable Housing Crisis and Limitations of Traditional Supply
The housing supply gap and resulting low vacancy rates have resulted in an affordable housing crisis for many Australian households. The average renter is now paying $200 more per week than they were in 2020.
In its third annual State of the Housing System Report, the National Supply and Affordability Council highlighted this issue and called for more “homes that are affordable, fit for purpose and secure, for all households, of all incomes and in all locations.”
Traditional forms of housing have consistently failed to meet these requirements, typically as a result of high build costs, planning delays and land scarcity in desirable urban locations. As a result, there is an urgent need for more alternative housing models.
How Co-Living Addresses the Housing Shortage in Australia
Government initiatives, such as increased housing supply, planning reforms and support for social housing, are important. Traditional approaches alone, however, are not enough to address the scale and speed of today’s Australian housing shortage.
One innovative alternative to traditional housing models is the concept of co-living properties. A co-living investment property is a purpose-designed house that can significantly increase housing density without sacrificing liveability.
In a traditional share house, multiple tenants live together in a space that was originally designed for a single-family occupancy. This less-than-ideal situation would often lead to tension, dissatisfaction and a high turnover of tenants. In contrast, a co-living property is specifically designed to suit the needs of multiple tenants.
The Benefits of Co-Living Properties in a Housing Shortage
What differentiates a co-living investment from a traditional single-tenancy investment property? Key features typically include:
- Multiple bedrooms with personal ensuites and kitchenettes for enhanced privacy.
- Shared living spaces custom-designed to suit multiple users simultaneously.
- Higher occupancy potential.
- Reduced rent and utility costs for occupants (assisting with long-term affordability).
- A community-oriented living model that fosters tenant satisfaction.
These features are what can make co-living a beneficial housing model for both tenants and investors. It provides renters with affordable housing options that don’t compromise on comfort and privacy. For investors, co-living properties can deliver multiple income streams on a single property, potentially increasing rental yield and reducing income loss caused by vacancies.
With these benefits in mind, it’s not surprising that co-living properties are becoming increasingly popular in cities facing ongoing housing shortages.
Why Investors Are Paying Attention
A growing number of Australians are starting to appreciate the role that co-living properties can play as part of a careful investment strategy, both during a housing shortage and as a long-term asset.
Co-living houses are appealing to a wider range of tenants, from young and healthcare professionals to essential workers, remote employees and retirees. This diverse tenant base can help reduce vacancy periods and encourage more consistent, longer-term occupancy.
A co-living property also supports increased rental yield through multiple tenancies. For example, instead of renting out a single-tenancy 3-bedroom property for $700 per week, a co-living property may allow you to charge three separate tenants $350 each per week, leading to substantial increases in annual rental yield.
Crucially, co-living properties shouldn’t be viewed as an interim solution to a short-term housing shortage problem. It’s a real estate model that has seen significant growth in major cities across Europe and Asia, and all indications are that it will continue to grow in popularity here too.
Why Choose INVIDA for Co-Living Investments?
Australia’s housing shortage is unlikely to be resolved overnight, creating a growing need for housing models that can deliver both affordability for tenants and strong long-term outcomes for investors. As co-living continues to gain momentum across Australia, investors have an opportunity to be part of a solution that addresses genuine market demand while building a resilient property portfolio.
At INVIDA, we understand that a successful co-living investment depends on more than choosing the right property. Our integrated team supports investors across finance, acquisition, design, construction, insurance and ongoing property management, creating a more streamlined and coordinated journey from planning through to operation.
To learn more about co-living investment opportunities and how they could fit into your investment strategy, contact INVIDA today.
